Decision No. 07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT On the issuance of Temporary Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council to Determine State Research Topics for the Period 2001-2005

This Decision issues Temporary Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council to Determine State Research Topics for the Period 2001-2005. The Provisions stipulate two steps to determine research topics: Step 1 to determine the List of Research Topics (Step 1) and Step 2 to determine the Summary Outline (Step 2). The Council uses a scoring principle to rank research topics, followed by voting according to the majority rule principle. This Decision takes effect from the date of signing.

Số hiệu07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT
Loại văn bảnDecision
Cơ quan ban hànhMinistry of Science and Technology
Người kýBùi Mạnh Hải — Thứ trưởng
Cập nhật01/07/2026
NgànhScience and Technology
Lĩnh vựcUncategorized
Ngày ban hành11/04/2001
Ngày áp dụng26/04/2001
Ngày hết hiệu lực15/06/2002
Tình trạngExpired
✦ Tóm lược thông minh

This Decision issues Temporary Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council to Determine State Research Topics for the Period 2001-2005. The Provisions stipulate two steps to determine research topics: Step 1 to determine the List of Research Topics (Step 1) and Step 2 to determine the Summary Outline (Step 2). The Council uses a scoring principle to rank research topics, followed by voting according to the majority rule principle. This Decision takes effect from the date of signing.

Đối tượng áp dụng

Science and Technology Council, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment

Các điểm cốt lõi

  • The Council determines the List of State Research Topics through two steps: Step 1 to determine the List of Research Topics (A, B, C, Not Recommended) and Step 2 to determine the Summary Outline.
  • Step 1 uses a scoring principle to classify research topics into levels A, B, C, and 'Not Recommended'.
  • Step 2 uses a majority voting principle to conclude on the Summary Outline for each research topic.
  • The Council elects a Counting Committee and votes according to the Ballot - DTCT - A or Ballot - DTDL - A form.
  • The results of the Council's work are compiled, recorded in the Minutes, and sent to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.

🌐 Tác động xã hội từ văn bản này

  • Positive impact: These provisions enhance the quality of scientific and technological research through a rigorous working process.
  • Negative impact: They may consume time and resources in the process of determining research topics.

❓ Câu hỏi thường gặp

What principle does the Council use to classify the List of Research Topics?

The Council uses a scoring principle to classify research topics into levels A, B, C, and 'Not Recommended'. Level A is from 90-100 points, B is from 70-89 points, C is from 50-69 points, and 'Not Recommended' is below 50 points.

How does the Council use the majority voting principle to determine the Summary Outline?

The Council uses a majority voting principle to conclude on the Summary Outline for each research topic. Each member evaluates by scoring according to the scale indicated on the ballot, then the Council approves each Summary Outline with a majority vote.

For which period does this Decision apply?

This Decision applies for the period 2001-2005.

How does the Council use the Ballot form to evaluate research topics?

The Council uses the Ballot - DTCT - A or Ballot - DTDL - A form to evaluate research topics. Valid ballots are those that score equal to or lower than the maximum score indicated on the corresponding evaluation criteria form.

When does this Decision take effect?

This Decision takes effect fifteen days after the date of signing.

Toàn văn

MINISTRY OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENT

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM
Independence – Freedom – Happiness

Number: 07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT
Hanoi,dated April 11, 2001

DECISION

Regarding the issuance of the Interim Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council for Determining State Research Topics for the 2001-2005 Period

Interim Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council for Determining State Research Topics for the 2001-2005 Period

__________________________________

MINISTER OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT

 

Pursuant to Decree No. 22/CP dated May 22, 1993 of the Government stipulating the tasks, powers, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment;

Pursuant to Article 19 of the Law on Science and Technology;

Pursuant to Decision No. 419/TTg dated July 21, 1995 of the Prime Minister regarding the management mechanism for scientific research and technological development activities;

Considering the proposal of the Director of the Department of Industrial Science and Technology Management, the Director of the Department of Agricultural Science and Technology Management, the Director of the Department of Social Sciences and Natural Sciences Management, and the Director of the Planning Department;

 

DECISION:

 

Article 1. Issuing the Interim Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council for Determining State Research Topics for the 2001-2005 Period.

Article 2. THIS DECISION SHALL TAKE EFFECT 15 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SIGNATURE.

Article 3. The Heads of the Planning Department, the Department of Science and Technology Management for Industry, the Department of Agricultural Science and Technology Management, the Department of Social Science and Natural Science Management, the Department of International Relations, the Director of the Ministry's Office, the Heads of units under the Ministry, and the Heads of related agencies and organizations are responsible for implementing this Decision./.

 

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

 

On the working method of the Science and Technology Council

determining state research topics for the 2001-2005 period

(Attached to Decision No. 07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT dated April 11, 2001)

4. The organizations and individuals proposed for selection are those with the highest ranked application files, but the average score must reach at least 70 out of 100 points, including a minimum average score of 50 out of 70 points for scientific and practical value.

I. PRINCIPLES OF WORKING OF THE COUNCIL

1. Meetings of the Council must have at least two-thirds of the members present (the opinions of absent members expressed in writing only have reference value).

2. Depending on the level of detail required for the content of the announcement for selecting (or directly assigning) each topic, the determination of state research topics will be carried out in one step - Step 1 - or both of the following steps:

Step 1: Determine the List of State Research Topics.

Step 2: Determine the Summary Outline of Each Topic

The Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment may use the advisory council that has provided advice to determine the List of topics (Step 1) to perform the task of drafting the summary outline (task of Step 2) or may establish a new advisory council for Step 2.

3. The advisory council of Step 1 (determining the List of topics) uses the principle of grading topics into levels A, B, C, and "Not Recommended" to select topics.

4. The advisory council of Step 2 uses the principle of majority voting to conclude on the summary outline for each topic.

II. PROCEDURE AND PROCEDURES FOR THE WORKING OF THE COUNCIL

II.1. The advisory council of Step 1 (determining the List of proposed state research topics within the Science and Technology Program or independent topics) works.

The Chairman of the Council presides over the meetings.

1. Before the Chairman of the Council chairs the meeting:

a) The Secretary of the Council reads the Decision establishing the Council, introduces the composition of the Council and the attending representatives.

b) A representative of the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment states the requirements and main contents of the Provisions on the determination of state science and technology tasks for the 2001-2005 period; introduces a summary of the preliminary consolidated list of topics expected to be included in the Science and Technology Program (for the Council determining topics within the Program), or independent topics by corresponding specialty (for the Council determining independent topics); introduces other necessary specialized and technical materials.

2. The Council discusses:

a) The Council examines, analyzes, and critiques the preliminary consolidated list of topics expected to be included in the Science and Technology Program or the preliminary consolidated list of independent topics provided by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment regarding the following aspects:

- Urgency (importance, urgency,...);

- Scientific and technological significance: novelty, technological advancement;

- Economic and social significance: applicability of the topic in practice (is it applicable? can it be applied on an industrial scale? can specific application addresses be identified? does it have a significant impact on the development of science and technology and/or economy and society?...);

- Feasibility (technically implementable); consistency with the objectives of the Program (for topics within the Program).

b) Amend or supplement, clarify, and accurately define the subject of study, objectives, content, and products stated for each topic in the List.

c) The Council thoroughly exchanges views on grading each topic to arrange them into levels A, B, C, and those topics to be placed in the "Not Recommended" level to facilitate voting.

3. The Council elects the Counting Committee and votes:

The Counting Committee consists of three members of the Council (one of whom is elected as Chair).

The advisory council determining state research topics within the Science and Technology Program votes to assess program topics according to the Model Form - DTCT - A.

The advisory council determining independent state research topics votes to assess independent topics according to the Model Form - DTDL - A. Valid ballots are those that score equal to or lower than the maximum points recorded on the corresponding evaluation criteria form.

Each member of the Council evaluates the proposal by scoring according to the scale recorded on the ballot.

Based on the scoring results, each member of the Council concludes on the assessment of each topic by classifying the topic into one of the levels: A, B, C, and "Not Recommended," specifically as follows:

- Level A: from 90 to 100 points;

- Level B: from 70 to 89 points;

- Level C: from 50 to 69 points;

- Not Recommended: below 50 points.

4. Compile the number of recommendation ballots.

The Counting Committee compiles the voting results of the Council according to the KP-ĐTCT-A and KP-ĐTĐL-A forms correspondingly for each Council.

5. The Council approves the Minutes of the Council's work results, recommending the List of proposed topics within the Science and Technology Program or the List of proposed independent topics by specialty within the corresponding field of science arranged in order of A, B, C from top to bottom, and sends it to the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment.

The Minutes of the Council's work are built according to the prescribed model: Model BBHĐ-CT-LA for the Council determining program topics and Model BBHĐ-ĐL-1A for the Council determining independent topics.

II.2. The advisory council of Step 2 (determining the summary outline of the topic) works.

The Chairman of the Council presides over the meetings.

1. Before the Chairman of the Council chairs the meeting (this section needs to be implemented when a new advisory council for Step 2 is established):

a) The Secretary of the Council reads the Decision establishing the Council, introduces the composition of the Council and the attending representatives.

b) The representative of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment presents the requirements and main contents of the regulations on determining the state's science and technology tasks for the period 2001-2005; introduces the List of topics under the Science and Technology Program or the List of independent topics in specialized fields within the corresponding scientific field that have been approved by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, and states the mission of the Council: to draft the outline summary of each topic - the state's order for topics to be announced for selection or directly assigned.

2. The Council discusses and assigns members to prepare the outline summary of the basic elements for each topic.

The Council discusses to unify the requirements for drafting the outline summary for each topic.

Each topic's concise outline includes the following basic elements:

- Proposed topic name;

- Required objectives;

- Expected results;

- Main economic and technical indicators to be achieved

In certain specific cases, the Council may propose other factors such as:

- Research content;

- Implementation deadline;

- Application address;

- Estimated budget.

The Council assigns two or three members who are knowledgeable to prepare the outline summary for each topic in the State's List of topics that have been approved by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.

When necessary, upon the Council's recommendation, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment may invite additional experts who are not Council members but are deeply knowledgeable in the research field of the topic to prepare the outline summary.

3. The Council unifies the outline summary of each topic.

After receiving the outline summaries for each topic prepared by the Council members or experts, the Council convenes to exchange, discuss, supplement, or modify details related to each basic element of the prepared outline summaries.

The Council approves each outline summary with a majority agreement.

The Council sends the Minutes of the Council's work with the outline summaries of the basic elements of each topic attached to the List of topics under the Science and Technology Program or the List of independent topics in specialized fields within the corresponding scientific field (according to the forms BBHĐ-CT-2A and BBHĐ-ĐL-2A respectively for each Council) that have been unanimously agreed upon by the Council./.

DEPUTY MINISTER
DEPUTY MINISTER
(Signed)
Bui Manh Hai
Văn bản này đang được cập nhật văn bản gốc, vui lòng xem nội dung toàn văn và kiểm tra lại sau.

Tải văn bản

Văn bản này đang được cập nhật văn bản gốc, vui lòng xem nội dung toàn văn và kiểm tra lại sau.

Bản đồ quan hệ

07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT
Decision No. 07/2001/QĐ-BKHCNMT On the issuance of Temporary Provisions on the Working Method of the Science and Technology Council to Determine State Research Topics for the Period 2001-2005
Expired

Bấm vào một văn bản để mở. Viền đỏ = quan hệ làm thay đổi hiệu lực.