Decision No. 20/20/2005/QĐ-BKHCN amends and supplements the regulations on the selection of organizations and individuals to lead the implementation of state-level scientific and technological research projects and pilot production projects. The registration dossier includes specific documents, the deadline for submitting the dossier is 15 days from the date of publication in the Official Gazette, and the evaluation is based on a scale of 5 points with specific criteria.
Đối tượng áp dụng
Organizations and individuals wishing to register to lead the implementation of state-level scientific and technological research projects or pilot production projects.
Các điểm cốt lõi
- Organizations and individuals participating in the selection must submit the registration dossier including specific documents to the Ministry of Science and Technology within the prescribed time limit.
- The dossier must be sealed and clearly marked with detailed information about the research project or pilot production project being registered.
- The Ministry of Science and Technology will be responsible for opening the dossiers and evaluating them based on a scale of 5 points with specific criteria for each type of project.
- Evaluation is based on criteria such as an overview of the research situation, approach, content and research methods, expected results, benefits of the project, and feasibility of the project.
- Organizations and individuals proposed for selection to lead social science research projects or scientific and technological research projects must achieve an average total score of at least 70/100, while pilot production projects require 65/100.
🌐 Tác động xã hội từ văn bản này
- Positive impact: Creates opportunities for capable organizations and individuals to participate in state-level scientific and technological projects, promoting research and development.
- Negative impact: May impose a burden in terms of time and cost on units required to prepare the dossier according to the regulations.
❓ Câu hỏi thường gặp
What does the registration dossier include?
The dossier includes the Registration Form, Project Description, Summary of Scientific and Technological Activities of the Organization, Personal Academic Resume, and confirmation documents regarding the agreement of collaborating organizations (if any).
What is the deadline for submitting the dossier?
The deadline for submitting the dossier is 15 days from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
On what criteria is the evaluation based?
Evaluation is based on criteria such as an overview of the research situation, approach, content and research methods, expected results, benefits of the project, and feasibility of the project.
Which organization will conduct the evaluation of the dossiers?
A panel appointed by the Ministry of Science and Technology consisting of two experts deeply knowledgeable in the field of research will provide critical reviews and evaluations of all submitted dossiers.
What are the conditions for being selected?
Organizations and individuals proposed for selection must achieve an average total score of at least 70/100 for social science and scientific and technological research projects, and 65/100 for pilot production projects, with no less than 3 points for each criterion.
Toàn văn
DECISION OF THE MINISTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Amending and supplementing Articles 6, Article 7, Article 9, Article 11, and Article 13 of the Regulations on the Selection of Organizations and Individuals to Lead the Implementation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects and National Pilot Production Projects
Issued together with Decision No. 16/2003/QĐ-BKHCN dated July 18, 2003 of the Minister of Science and Technology
On the basis of Decree No. 54/2003/NĐ-CP dated May 19, 2003 of the Government stipulating the functions, tasks, powers, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Science and Technology, and Decree No. 28/2004/NĐ-CP dated January 16, 2004 of the Government amending and supplementing certain articles of Decree No. 54/2003/NĐ-CP;
On the basis of Decision No. 16/2003/QĐ-BKHCN dated July 18, 2003 of the Minister of Science and Technology promulgating the "Regulations on the Selection of Organizations and Individuals to Lead the Implementation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects and National Pilot Production Projects;"
THE MINISTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Pursuant to Decree No. 81/2002/NĐ-CP dated October 17, 2002 of the Government detailing the implementation of certain provisions of the Law on Science and Technology;
Pursuant to the proposals of the Heads of the Departments of Economic and Technical Sciences, Social Sciences and Natural Sciences, and Planning and Finance under the Department of Science and Technology;
Amending and supplementing Articles 6, Article 7, Article 9, Article 11, and Article 13 of the Regulations on the Selection of Organizations and Individuals to Lead the Implementation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects and National Pilot Production Projects issued together with Decision No. 16/2003/QĐ-BKHCN dated July 18, 2003 of the Minister of Science and Technology as follows:
Article 6. The application dossier for selection (referred to as the Dossier) shall include the following documents:
DECISION:
Article 1. Application form for leading the implementation of research projects and pilot production projects according to the prescribed format (form B1-1-ĐONTC.SĐ);
Detailed description of social science and humanities research projects, scientific research and technology development projects (referred to as social science research projects and scientific research projects), and pilot production projects according to the prescribed format (forms B1-2-TMKHXH, B1-2-TMKHCN, and B1-2-TMDA.SĐ respectively);
Summary of scientific and technological activities of the organization applying to lead the research project and pilot production project (form B1-3-LLTC);
Scientific curriculum vitae of individuals applying to implement the main research project and pilot production project (form B1-4-LLCN.SĐ);
Confirmation document from organizations applying to cooperate in research (form B1-5-PHNC.SĐ) - if there is cooperation in research.
Legal documents proving the ability to mobilize funds from other sources (in cases where organizations and individuals have declared the mobilization of funds from other sources).
Organizations and individuals participating in the selection must submit one set of Dossiers (including one original copy and fifteen copies) to the Ministry of Science and Technology at 39 Tran Hung Dao Street, Hanoi (through the Post Office or directly) within the specified time limit.
The Dossier must be sealed and clearly marked on the outside as follows:
Article 7.
1. Name of the research project and pilot production project being selected for organization and individual leadership;
2. Name and code number of the Science and Technology Program (if applicable); field of science and technology;
3. Name and address of the organization applying to lead the research project and pilot production project;
4. Full name of the individual applying to be the head of the research project and pilot production project and list of those participating in the main implementation of the research project and pilot production project:
- For applications to select social science research projects: fully complete as declared in item 22 of form B1-2-TMKHXH Detailed Description of Social Science Research Project or form B1-2-TMKHCN Detailed Description of Scientific Research and Technology Development Project accordingly;
- For applications to select pilot production projects: fully complete as declared in item 11 of form B1-2-TMDA.SĐ Detailed Description of Pilot Production Project.
5. List of documents and papers included in the Dossier.
The Dossier must be submitted on time. The submission date is determined by the postmark of the Hanoi Post Office (for submissions through the Post Office) or the stamp of the Ministry of Science and Technology's Reception Office (for direct submissions).
The Ministry of Science and Technology will take the lead in opening the Dossier. Representatives of the Advisory Council for Selection, relevant agencies, and representatives of organizations and individuals applying for selection will be invited to attend.
The process of opening the Dossier will be recorded in a protocol signed and stamped by the Ministry of Science and Technology, the representative of the Advisory Council for Selection, and the representative of the organization and individual applying for selection (if present).
Article 9.
Dossiers that meet the conditions stipulated in Articles 5 and 8 of the Regulations on the Selection of Organizations and Individuals to Lead the Implementation of Scientific and Technological Research Projects and National Pilot Production Projects issued together with Decision No. 16/2003/QĐ-BKHCN dated July 18, 2003 of the Minister of Science and Technology (referred to as Decision 16) and Articles 6 and 7 of this Decision will be considered for evaluation. At the same time, it must ensure that at least two-thirds of the individuals applying to participate in the main implementation of the research project and pilot production project are confirmed by their respective organizations. In cases where the Dossier lacks legal documents proving the ability to mobilize funds from other sources as stipulated in item 6 of Article 6 of Decision 16, it will still be considered valid but will not be credited for mobilizing other funds.
The evaluation of the Dossier will be conducted using a scoring method based on specific criteria corresponding to social science research projects, scientific research and technology development projects, and pilot production projects; a scale of 5 points will be used to quantify each criterion (1 point: poor; 2 points: weak; 3 points: average; 4 points: good; 5 points: excellent); coefficients will be used to indicate the importance of each criterion.
The specific criteria, scales, and coefficients are as follows:
Article 11.
A. Evaluation of the Selection of Organizations and Individuals to Lead Social Science Research Projects
Evaluation
Scale
Evaluation criterion |
Currency Exchange Agent No. 1 Maximum Points |
||||||
|
Coefficient |
I. Overview of research situation and justification for the necessity of the project |
Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 10 of the Detailed Description of the Project |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|||
|
The completeness and clarity of the assessment and analysis of the research situation both domestically and internationally; the level of updating the latest information about the research field (Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of existing research works; the degree of clarification of the historical research process; the clarity, scientific nature, and specificity of the research problem statement and justification for the necessity of the project; the specificity of the goal formulation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1. II. Approach, content, and research methods |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 11, 12, and 13 of the Detailed Description of the Project |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Approach, content and research methods (Experts evaluate this criterion based on Sections 11, 12, and Section 13 of the Research Topic Rationale) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
3. The scientific and uniqueness of the research approach |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. The completeness, logic, up-to-date nature, and suitability of the research content and corresponding research methods to achieve the project's objectives |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. The level of clarity of the main content that must be achieved by the project |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Expected Research Results(Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 16, 17, 18, and item 19 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
6. The completeness, reasonableness, and degree of concretization of the output products compared to the goals and research content |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Novelty and creativity (new proposals, new solutions in essence; traditional research issues but with new perspectives for solving them, etc.) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Benefits of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on item 20 of The Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
8. Anticipated impact (New contributions, opening up new research directionsto the field of science; impact on society in general (contributions to policy formulation; the potential to change societal perceptions, ...); practical applicability of the research results - specify the application addresses |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Anticipated publication of works both domestically and internationally |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Anticipated contribution to postgraduate training (master's, doctoral) through the implementation of the project |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. The degree of enhancing the capacity and perfecting the research skills of individuals and teams of scientists through the implementation of the project |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Feasibility of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 14, 15, 21, 22, 23 of the Project Description, Detailed Budget Estimate for Implementing the Project and summaries of activities of organizations, scientific resumes of the main researchers of the project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
12. Professional competence and actual time available for research of the main scientific and technological staff implementing the project |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Organizational implementation capability (scientific and rational planning, milestones to be achieved, completion ability, research cooperation capability, etc.); |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. The accuracy of the total budget estimate relative to the quality and quantity of expected products; the reasonableness of budget allocation for research contents |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
100 |
||||||
B. Evaluation of Selection of Organizations and Individuals Leading Scientific Research and Technological Development Projects
Evaluation criterion |
Currency Exchange Agent No. 1 Maximum Points |
||||||
|
Coefficient |
I. Overview of research situation and justification for the necessity of the project |
Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 10 of the Detailed Description of the Project |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|||
|
The completeness and clarity of the assessment and analysis of the research situation both domestically and internationally; the level of updating the latest information about the research field (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 10 and 11 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1. The completeness and clarity of the evaluation and analysis of the research situation, and the comparison of the differences in product and technology levels between domestic and foreign countries |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of existing research works and limitations of domestic products and technologies that need to be addressed; the clarity, scientific nature, and specificity of the explanation regarding the necessity of researching the project; the specificity of the goal |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Approach, Content, and Research Methods (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 12, 13, and 14 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
3. The scientific nature, uniqueness, and appropriateness of the approach and research methods |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. The completeness, appropriateness, and logic of the research content relative to the objectives (general objectives and stage-specific objectives) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. The degree of clarity of the important and main content of the project |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Expected Research Results (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 16, 17, and 18 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
6. The completeness, reasonableness, and compatibility in quantity and quality of the products and research outcomes compared to the goals and research content |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. The scientific and technological level of the products and technologies expected to be created compared to similar domestic and international products and technologies |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. The suitability and feasibility of the products and outcomes created under Vietnamese conditions Male |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Application Potential and Effectiveness of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 18, 19, 20, and item 21 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
9. Economic and social effectiveness, scientific and technological impact |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. The feasibility of transfer, expansion, and commercialization plans for research outcomes |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. The competitiveness of the technology or product created compared to imported technology or purchasing similar products |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Feasibility of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 15, 20, 21, 22, 23 of the Project Description, Detailed Budget Estimate for Implementing the Project and summaries of activities of organizations, scientific resumes of the main researchers of the project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
12. Professional competence and actual time available for research of the main scientific and technological staff implementing the project |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Organizational implementation capability (scientific and rational planning, milestones to be achieved, completion ability, etc.) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Infrastructure; domestic and international cooperation serving the project |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. The accuracy of the total budget estimate relative to the quality and quantity of expected products; the reasonableness of budget allocation for research contents (especially labor costs and equipment purchases) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
100 |
||||||
C. Evaluation of Selection of Organizations and Individuals Leading Technology Transfer and Commercialization Projects
Evaluation criterion |
Currency Exchange Agent No. 1 Maximum Points |
||||||
|
Coefficient |
I. Overview of research situation and justification for the necessity of the project |
Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 10 of the Detailed Description of the Project |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|||
|
I. Technological Value of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on items 13.1, 14.2, 15.1, and 15.2 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
1. The degree of technological perfection of the project |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The technological level of the main products and technologies of the project compared to similar domestic and international products |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Implementation Plan for the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on Section 16 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
3. The rationality and feasibility of the implementation plan |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. The completeness, accuracy, and rationality of the financial plan |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. The clarity and feasibility of the business plan for the product and the ability to recover investment costs |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Total Investment and Direct Benefits of the Project (Experts evaluate this criterion based on Part III, Sections 16.2, 13.2, and 13.3 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
6. The rationality of the total investment in implementing the project compared to the expected results |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Expected direct benefits |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Marketability and Long-term Development Potential of the Project After Completion (Experts evaluate this criterion based on Sections 13.5 and 16.3 of the Project Description) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
8. The transferability of the project's outcomes |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. The market penetration capability of the project's outcomes both domestically and internationally |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. The potential for expansion and long-term development of the project both domestically and internationally |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Implementation Capacity (Experts evaluate this criterion based on Sections 13.4, 16, and Part III of the Project Description and summaries of activities of the organization, scientific resumes of individuals primarily responsible for the main topics and projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
11. The capacity, reputation, and actual time available for implementing the project by the primary scientific and technological personnel |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Material resources; the level of commitment from domestic and international partners to support the implementation of the project |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. The authenticity of the requested funding support relative to the results and investment objectives, and the rationality of the corresponding budget allocation for project implementation |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. The level of commitment to other sources of funding (the feasibility of raising other sources of funding) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
100 |
||||||
Article 13:
The Council assigns two experts with deep knowledge in the research field of the Research Topic and the Science and Technology Project to review and comment on all applications for selecting the principal implementer of one (01) Research Topic or Science and Technology Project. When necessary, the Council may recommend that the Ministry of Science and Technology invite external experts with deep knowledge in the research field of the Research Topic and Science and Technology Project to review and comment on the applications (these experts will not vote on the applications).
The reviewing expert is responsible for researching, analyzing, and comparing the applications for selecting the principal implementer of one (01) Research Topic or Science and Technology Project, conducting reviews and evaluations of each application according to the criteria set forth in Article 11 of this Regulation as amended, writing comments and evaluations for each application.
The Council organizes meetings to discuss and evaluate by voting scores.
In cases where only one (01) application participates in the selection process for the principal implementer of one (01) Research Topic or Science and Technology Project, the Council still conducts evaluations according to the standards and procedures specified in this Regulation.
The organization or individual proposed as the winner for the principal implementer of the Social Sciences Research Topic or Natural Sciences Research Topic is the organization or individual whose application has the highest ranking, but must achieve an average score of at least 70 out of 100 points, with no less than 3 points for each criterion.
The organization or individual proposed as the winner for the principal implementer of the Science and Technology Project is the organization or individual whose application has the highest ranking, but must achieve an average score of at least 65 out of 100 points, with no less than 3 points for each criterion.
The Council ranks applications for selecting the principal implementer of one (01) Research Topic with an average total score of 70 out of 100 points or higher, with no less than 3 points for each criterion (or applications for selecting the principal implementer of one (01) Science and Technology Project with an average total score of 65 out of 100 points or higher, with no less than 3 points for each criterion), according to the following principles:
- Average total scores in descending order;
- Priority given to the Chairman's score (or Deputy Chairman's score, in the absence of the Chairman) for applications with the same average total score;
For applications with the same average total score, the Chairman's score (or Deputy Chairman's score, in the absence of the Chairman), the Council recommends that the Ministry of Science and Technology consider and decide.
If there is no application achieving an average total score of 70 out of 100 points or higher for a Research Topic (or 65 out of 100 points or higher for a Science and Technology Project), the Research Topic or Science and Technology Project will not be implemented in the annual plan.
The Council discusses and proposes additional or necessary amendments to the contents described in the Research Topic and Science and Technology Project Description and recommendations regarding funding for the implementation of the Research Topic and Science and Technology Project, or highlights points to note during the completion of the application by the selected organization and individual.
The Council records the evaluation of the applications registered for selection and recommends the winning organizations and individuals.
The working method of the Scientific and Technological Council for selecting organizations and individuals as the principal implementers of National-level Research Topics and Science and Technology Projects is stipulated in the Decision of the Minister of Science and Technology.
Article 2. The Standard Measurement Quality Control Department shall be responsible for organizing and guiding the implementation of the Regulations adopted herein.
Article 3. The Heads of the Departments of Science and Technology in economic and technical sectors, the Department of Social Sciences and Natural Sciences, the Department of Planning and Finance, the Director of the Office, the Heads of units under the Ministry, and the Heads of related agencies and organizations are responsible for implementing this Decision.
DEPUTY MINISTER
Tải văn bản
Văn bản này đang được cập nhật văn bản gốc, vui lòng xem nội dung toàn văn và kiểm tra lại sau.
Bản đồ quan hệ
Bấm vào một văn bản để mở. Viền đỏ = quan hệ làm thay đổi hiệu lực.
Bản dịch
Văn bản này có sẵn ở các ngôn ngữ sau: