Decision No. 22/2005/QD-BKHCN of the Ministry of Science and Technology stipulates the criteria for awarding the Flag of Excellence to provincial Departments of Science and Technology with outstanding achievements in managing science and technology, applicable to Departments of Science and Technology of provinces/cities directly under the Central Government. Notable points include specific scoring standards and procedures for awarding the Flag of Excellence.
适用范围
Collective of provincial Departments of Science and Technology
要点
- Collectives of provincial Departments of Science and Technology → are eligible for the Flag of Excellence of the Ministry of Science and Technology if they achieve a score of 80 points or higher, including six main criteria.
- The maximum scoring standard is 100 points, with specific criteria such as management of scientific and technological activities, application of research projects to production and daily life, implementation of mechanisms and policies for developing science and technology, internal solidarity, and thrift.
- The awarding procedure includes: a dossier consisting of a Request Letter, achievement report, endorsement document from the Provincial People's Committee, and a summary score sheet; the awarding process goes through regional Departments of Science and Technology, Regional Cluster Heads, and the Ministry’s Commendation Council.
- The Flag of Excellence is awarded at the regional conference following the Minister's decision.
- Each region elects a rotating Cluster Head every two-year term.
🌐 本文件的社会影响
- Positive impact: Encourages provincial Departments of Science and Technology to improve the quality of their management and apply science and technology to practical applications.
- Negative impact: Burden of scoring procedures and dossier preparation for participating units.
❓ 常见问题
When is the Flag of Excellence awarded?
The Flag of Excellence is awarded at the regional conference following the Minister's decision.
What are the scoring criteria for awarding the Flag of Excellence?
The scoring criteria for awarding the Flag of Excellence have a maximum of 100 points, including criteria such as management of scientific and technological activities, application of research projects to production and daily life, implementation of mechanisms and policies for developing science and technology, internal solidarity, and thrift.
What does the awarding procedure for the Flag of Excellence include?
The awarding procedure includes a dossier consisting of a Request Letter, achievement report, endorsement document from the Provincial People's Committee, and a summary score sheet; the awarding process goes through regional Departments of Science and Technology, Regional Cluster Heads, and the Ministry’s Commendation Council.
How many scoring criteria are there for awarding the Flag of Excellence?
There are six scoring criteria for awarding the Flag of Excellence.
What minimum score must the collective of provincial Departments of Science and Technology achieve to be eligible for the Flag of Excellence?
The collective of provincial Departments of Science and Technology must achieve a score of 80 points or higher to be eligible for the Flag of Excellence.
全文
DECISION OF THE MINISTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Regarding the issuance of the "Regulation on Awarding the Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology"
THE MINISTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Pursuant to Decree No. 54/2003/NĐ-CP dated May 19, 2003 of the Government stipulating the functions, tasks, powers, and organizational structure of the Ministry of Science and Technology; Decree No. 28/2004/NĐ-CP dated January 16, 2004 of the Government amending and supplementing certain articles of Decree No. 54/2003/NĐ-CP;
Pursuant to Circular No. 17/2004/TT-BKHCN dated July 13, 2004 of the Ministry of Science and Technology guiding competition and reward work in the field of science and technology;
At the proposal of the Standing Committee of the Competition and Reward Council of the Ministry of Science and Technology,
DECISION:
Article 1. The "Regulation on Awarding the Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology" is hereby promulgated together with this Decision.
Article 2. The Standard Measurement Quality Control Department shall be responsible for organizing and guiding the implementation of the Regulations adopted herein.
Article 3. The Director of the Personnel Organization Department, the Director of the Planning and Finance Department, the Head of the Office, members of the Competition and Reward Council of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Directors of Provincial and Municipal Science and Technology Departments directly under the Central Government shall be responsible for implementing this Decision./.
REGULATION
ON AWARDING THE FLAG OF EXCELLENCE COMPETITION OF THE MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
(Issued together with Decision No. 22/2005/QĐ-BKHCN
dated December 27, 2005 of the Minister of Science and Technology)
PART I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1. Scope of Regulation
This Regulation stipulates the criteria, procedures, files, and sequence for awarding the Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology.
Article 2. Applicability
This Regulation stipulates the awarding of the Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology to outstanding provincial/municipal Science and Technology Departments in each region.
Article 3. Principles for conferring titles
The awarding of the Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology must be carried out accurately, transparently, fairly, and promptly based on the correct assessment of the effectiveness of the work of the Science and Technology Departments.
Article 4. Time of Awarding
The Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology is awarded once every two years for each region and presented at the regional conference.
Chapter II
CRITERIA FOR RECOGNITION AND AWARD
Article 5. General Criteria
The Flag of Excellence Competition of the Ministry of Science and Technology is awarded to provincial/municipal Science and Technology Departments that meet the following criteria:
1. Excellently and comprehensively completing all assigned tasks over two years with high quality and efficiency; having a regular, practical, and effective competition movement;
2. Effectively implementing management activities related to scientific research, technological development, measurement standards, intellectual property, inspection... in the locality;
3. Effectively organizing and implementing many projects into production and daily life;
4. Effectively implementing state policies for the development of science and technology, management systems of the Ministry of Science and Technology contributing to the socio-economic development of the locality;
5. Having new factors and models for other units in the region to learn from; internal unity, practicing thrift effectively, combating waste, corruption, and social evils; no individual or group violating the law;
6. Being selected by other provincial/municipal Science and Technology Departments in the region as the leading unit in terms of competition achievements.
Article 6. Specific criteria and scoring scale
|
No. |
Basic standard |
Maximum score |
Remarks |
|
1 |
Excellently and comprehensively completing assigned tasks over two years with high quality and efficiency. |
60
|
|
|
1.1 |
Effectively implementing all aspects of management work: scientific research and technological development, standards - measurement - quality, intellectual property, radiation safety, inspection... at the local level, contributing to economic and social development, reinforcing national defense security of the locality. |
20 |
|
|
1.2 |
Excellently fulfilling the advisory role for the Provincial People's Committee on science and technology activities. |
10 |
|
|
1.3 |
Organizing the effective application of many topics and projects in production and daily life at the local level. |
15 |
- Effectively applying more than 50% of topics and projects in production and daily life15 points) - Effectively applying from 40-50% of topics and projects10 points) - Effectively applying less than 40% of topics and projects5 points) |
|
Organizing the effective implementation of state policies and mechanisms for the development of science and technology. The detailed scores are as follows: |
15 |
||
|
- Support policy for businesses investing in science and technology. |
3 |
||
|
- Policy encouraging the application of advanced techniques. |
4 |
||
|
- Policy encouraging the attraction of science and technology resources. |
3 |
||
|
- Establishing regulatory documents that meet the needs of science and technology management at the local level. |
5 |
||
|
Having new factors and models for other units in the region to learn from; paying attention to developing human resources in science and technology. The detailed scores are as follows: |
15 |
||
|
- Making improvements, innovations, and reforms in science and technology management that yield clear results. |
7 |
||
|
- Building advanced models in management work (for example, applying advanced quality management systems; using information technology in state administration...) |
5 |
||
|
- Paying attention to developing the cadre team to meet management requirements (especially postgraduate training...) |
3 |
||
|
Internal unity, exemplary compliance with Party guidelines and state laws, practicing thrift effectively, combating corruption, waste, and social evils; no individual or group violating the law. The detailed scores are as follows: |
10 |
||
|
- Internal unity, exemplary compliance with Party guidelines and state laws. |
4 |
||
|
- Practicing thrift effectively, combating corruption, waste, and social evils. |
3 |
||
|
- No individual or group violating the law. |
3 |
||
|
4 |
Competition and award work |
15 |
|
|
Having regular, practical, and effective competition movements; actively engaging in social activities. The detailed scores are as follows: |
5 |
||
|
- Organizing the launch and summary of competition movements. |
3 |
||
|
- Actively participating in charitable and social activities. |
2 |
||
|
Competition achievements. The detailed scores are as follows: |
10 |
||
|
- The unit has 100% individuals completing assigned tasks, including 70% individuals achieving advanced laborers, with 1 to 2 individuals receiving the title of Outstanding Worker at the provincial level or being awarded a Certificate of Merit by the Ministry or province. |
4 |
||
|
- The Department receives a Certificate of Merit from the Ministry or Provincial People's Committee. |
4 |
||
|
- The Party organization and mass organizations achieve integrity and strength. |
2 |
||
|
Total |
100 |
Chapter III
PROCEDURES, DOCUMENTS AND SEQUENCES FOR AWARDS
COMPETITION FLAGS
Article 7. Procedures for awarding
Based on the proposal of the Ministry of Science and Technology's Competition and Award Council, the Minister decides to award the Competition Flag to the best-performing Science and Technology Department in the region.
Article 8. The dossier for award consideration includes:
- The proposal letter for award consideration from the Regional Cluster Leader.
- A report on the achievements of the Science and Technology Department over the two years under consideration for the Flag of Excellence Award. (Note: The achievement report must clearly state the evaluation contents based on the scoring criteria.)
- An endorsement document recommending commendation from the People's Committee of the province/city directly under the Central Government for the Science and Technology Department.
- A table summarizing the average score of each Science and Technology Department (according to Appendix 3 model).
Article 9. Procedures for award consideration
1. Each Science and Technology Department shall submit its achievement report to other Science and Technology Departments in the region before the regional coordination meeting for cross-evaluation. 3 months The Competition and Commendation Council of the Science and Technology Departments will base their self-assessment scores for their own departments and all departments in the region
2. (according to Appendix 1 model), with results compiled into a form (according to Appendix 2 model) and submitted to the Regional Cluster Leader, the assessment scores of the Science and Technology Departments will be summarized to calculate the average score of each department (according to Appendix 3 model). For Science and Technology Departments achieving an average score of 80 points or higher, the Regional Cluster Leader is responsible for informing these departments to seek the endorsement of the provincial/city People's Committee agreeing to recommend them for the Flag of Excellence Award. 3. The Regional Cluster Leader organizes the summary of competition activities, compiles a list of Science and Technology Departments with an average score of 80 points
to be submitted to the Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry for review and selection of the Science and Technology Department with outstanding achievements in the region for the Flag of Excellence Award. or more. 4. The Regional Cluster Leader submits the dossier for award consideration to the Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry before the regional coordination meeting and Law No. 47/2024/QH15 1.5 months.
5. After receiving complete dossiers from the Regional Cluster Leader, the Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry will convene a meeting to consider the Flag of Excellence Award, based on: + The proposal letter for award consideration from the Regional Cluster Leader.
+ Achievement reports of the Science and Technology Departments.
+ Comments from the Planning and Finance Department and other functional departments within the Ministry regarding the implementation of science and technology plans and other tasks of the Science and Technology Departments.
+ Endorsement comments from the provincial/city People's Committee.
6. The Council will select one Science and Technology Department in the region to be recommended by the Minister for the Flag of Excellence Award. The results of the commendation will be announced to the Science and Technology Departments after being decided by the Minister.
Regions elect the Regional Cluster Leader on a rotational basis and inform the Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry (with a term of two years, so the locality hosting the conference will have its Science and Technology Department Director assume the responsibility of the new term's Cluster Leader).
The Regional Cluster Leader is responsible for organizing the signing of competition agreements between Science and Technology Departments; organizing mid-term reviews (once a year), and organizing the final summary of competition work (every two years).
Chapter IV
IMPLEMENTATION
Article 10. The Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry of Science and Technology is responsible for reviewing and selecting the most outstanding Science and Technology Department in the region to be recommended by the Minister for the Flag of Excellence Award and presenting it during the regional coordination meeting.
Article 11. During the implementation of this regulation, if there are any difficulties, please reflect them to the Standing Committee of the Competition and Commendation Council of the Ministry of Science and Technology for review and adjustment to ensure suitability./.
Article 12. The Council for Competition and Awards of the Ministry of Science and Technology shall be responsible for reviewing and selecting the most outstanding provincial Department of Science and Technology in the region to recommend the Minister to present the Flag of Excellence and to award it during the regional meeting.
Chapter V
IMPLEMENTING PROVISIONS
Article 13. During the implementation of this regulation, if there are any difficulties, they should be reported to the Standing Body of the Council for Competition and Awards of the Ministry of Science and Technology for review and adjustment to ensure appropriateness./.
DEPUTY MINISTER
关系图
点击文件即可打开。红色边框＝改变效力的关系。