JOINT CIRCULAR No. 2750 provides for material incentives for products awarded the National Quality Mark, including the premium price rate and the use of the premium fund. The Circular applies to state-owned economic organizations and collective production units.
적용 범위
State-owned economic organizations and collective production units
핵심 사항
- Industrial, forestry, fishery, and agricultural products awarded the high-level or Level I National Quality Mark shall be eligible for quality premium pricing (Article 1).
- The maximum quality premium rate for products awarded the high-level National Quality Mark shall not exceed 10% of the wholesale price excluding state revenue, and for Level I, it is 5% (Clause 1.a, b, Article 2).
- The quality premium shall be added to the delivery price and subsequent sales price of the product for consumers (Clause 3.a, Article 2).
- The quality premium fund must be remitted to the state budget at a rate of between 10% and 20%, with the remainder used for production development funds, rewards, and welfare benefits (Clause 4, Article 2).
- Products failing to meet the specified quality standards will have their National Quality Mark revoked and must remit all collected quality premiums from customers to the state budget (Article 3).
🌐 이 문서의 사회적 영향
- Encouraging the production of high-quality products to enhance national economic efficiency.
- Increasing consumer costs when purchasing products awarded the National Quality Mark.
- Contributing to stabilizing and improving product quality in the market.
- Production facilities may benefit from increased selling prices due to quality premiums.
- Consumers may be affected by higher prices when purchasing products awarded the National Quality Mark.
❓ 자주 묻는 질문
Which products are eligible for quality premium pricing?
Industrial, forestry, fishery, and agricultural products that have undergone processing and manufacturing by state-owned economic organizations and collective production units for domestic consumption and export.
What is the maximum quality premium rate?
For products awarded the high-level National Quality Mark, the maximum quality premium rate is 10% of the wholesale price excluding state revenue, and for Level I, it is 5%. Higher rates may be proposed but must be supported by detailed calculation explanations.
How is the quality premium used?
Between 10% and 20% of the quality premium fund is remitted to the state budget, with the remainder used for production development funds, rewards, and welfare benefits according to the decision of the Factory Director.
How are products failing to meet quality standards handled?
They will have their National Quality Mark revoked and must remit all collected quality premiums to the state budget, and simultaneously, the remaining products must be priced accordingly to reflect the reduced quality level.
When does this Circular take effect?
From January 1, 1988, replacing Joint Circular No. 776-TT/LB dated June 28, 1983.
전문
JOINT CIRCULAR
JOINT CIRCULAR NO. 2750-KHKT/VG/TC/TT OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE - NATIONAL PRICE CONTROL COUNCIL - NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL DATED DECEMBER 23, 1987 ON TEMPORARY REGULATIONS FOR INCENTIVES IN MATERIALS FOR PRODUCTS WITH STATE QUALITY MARKS
To encourage the production of high-quality products that bring about national economic efficiency, the Joint Ministry of the National Science and Technology Council - National Price Control Council - Ministry of Finance issued Circular No. 776-TT/LB dated June 28, 1983 on the matter of material incentives for industrial products bearing State Quality Marks.
The issuance of this Circular has contributed to stabilizing and gradually improving product quality. However, in light of the reform of management mechanisms, to promptly meet current requirements of sectors, localities, and grassroots economic units, the Joint Ministry issues this amended Circular as follows:
I- CONDITIONS FOR CONSIDERATION OF QUALITY INCENTIVE PRICES.
Industrial products, agricultural, forestry, and fishery products... which have undergone industrial processing and manufacturing by state-owned and collective organizations for domestic consumption and exportation, if they satisfy the following conditions, shall be eligible for consideration of quality incentive prices:
1. They must be granted a high-level or Level I State Quality Mark by the General Bureau of Standards-Measurement-Quality.
2. They must be approved by designated sales organizations regarding the level of quality incentive prices.
3. They must have a source of quality incentive prices derived from the economic benefits formed within the retail price consistent with the State Quality Marked product's quality.
4. They must register their application for quality incentive prices at the beginning of the year with the same-level price control and finance authorities.
II- QUALITY INCENTIVE PRICES FOR PRODUCTS AND USE OF THE QUALITY INCENTIVE FUND
1. Levels of quality incentive prices.
a) Products granted a high-level State Quality Mark may receive a maximum quality incentive price not exceeding 10% of the wholesale industrial selling price excluding state revenue (or tax).
b) Products granted a Level I State Quality Mark may receive a maximum quality incentive price not exceeding 5% of the wholesale industrial selling price excluding state revenue (or tax).
c) For products granted both high-level and Level I State Quality Marks with high economic efficiency, the producing entity may request a higher quality incentive price than the aforementioned limits, but must present a detailed calculation plan to the State Product Quality Evaluation Council for review and recommendation to the competent financial and price control authorities for approval.
The quality incentive price for these products shall not exceed the achieved economic efficiency and must be approved by the designated sales organization.
d) The wholesale industrial selling price and state revenue (or tax) mentioned in points a, b, and c shall be determined by the National Price Control Council, Ministry of Finance, or the competent authority of the industry's price control and finance sector.
2. Validity period of quality incentive prices.
a) Quality incentive prices shall take effect from the date the producing entity and the designated sales organization agree on the quality incentive price level recorded in the economic contract when delivering goods.
The maximum validity period of quality incentive prices shall be equal to the duration of the State Quality Mark's validity.
b) During the validity period of the State Quality Mark, if the product does not meet the specified quality standards, the designated sales organization may refuse to accept the quality incentive price amount and report the situation to the Joint Ministry of the National Science and Technology Council (General Bureau of Standards-Measurement-Quality) - National Price Control Council - Ministry of Finance for handling.
3. Pricing of products granted State Quality Marks.
a) The level of quality incentive prices for products stipulated in point 1, Section II of this Joint Circular shall be added to the delivery price and subsequent stage selling price (wholesale material price, retail price...) of the product for consumers.
b) Export products granted State Quality Marks shall also have the quality incentive price added to the delivery price of the producing entity to the export trading organization, but must ensure compliance with the State-prescribed export quota prices for each time period and product group.
c) Domestic consumer products granted State Quality Marks, if they align with customer preferences, may have a higher retail price increase than the quality incentive price based on the nature of each product. In such cases, the producing entity must negotiate with the designated sales organization to develop a pricing plan for submission to the competent financial and price control authorities for approval. Any difference between the increased retail price and the quality incentive price must be paid into the State budget by state-owned producing entities. For collective producing entities, this difference must be paid by the designated sales organization.
4. Distribution and use of the quality incentive fund.
The quality incentive fund shall be used as follows:
- Deposited into the State budget from 10% to 20%, as decided by the competent financial authority based on the recommendation of the State Product Quality Evaluation Council.
- The remainder shall be allocated to production development funds, awards, welfare... and used according to the current State financial regulations (including warranty costs). The ratio of these funds shall be determined by the Factory Director.
III- MATERIAL PENALTIES FOR PRODUCTS GRANTED STATE QUALITY MARKS BUT FAILING TO MEET SPECIFIED QUALITY STANDARDS.
1. Products bearing State Quality Marks currently receiving quality incentive prices, if found during inspection to not meet the specified quality standards, will have their State Quality Mark revoked, and the producing entity must pay the entire quality incentive price collected from customers into the State budget. This payment shall be calculated based on the quantity of products sold between two inspection periods. Remaining products must be revalued according to the reduced quality standard.
2. Products whose State Quality Mark validity period has expired without renewal certification shall not receive quality incentive prices. If permitted to be sold at the previously incentivized price, this difference (quality incentive price) must be fully deposited into the State budget.
3. If a state quality-marked product does not meet the specified quality level within the warranty period, the production entity shall be responsible for compensating (replacing or repairing...) the product to the consumer without charging any additional fees.
IV. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT THE ADDED PRICE.
1. For important products whose prices are determined by the Council of Ministers and the State Price Control Committee, the added price level shall be decided by the State Price Control Committee; the production entity of the product shall be responsible for preparing the added price plan to submit to the State Price Control Committee and the Ministry of Finance for review.
2. For all other products, the added price level shall be determined through mutual agreement between the production entity and the designated consumption organization within the maximum limit stipulated in Section II of this Joint Circular. This added price shall be uniformly applied to all customers and recorded in the economic contract serving as the legal basis for implementation by all relevant agencies.
The competent pricing authority has the right to decide on changing the agreed-upon added price if it deems it unreasonable. In cases where both parties cannot reach an agreement on the added price or if the agreed-upon added price exceeds the maximum limit, the production entity of the product must prepare an added price plan (accompanied by the opinion of the designated consumption organization) to submit to the competent pricing authority for decision.
3. Production entities producing state quality-marked products that enjoy added prices shall report the added price level and the effective date of the quality-added price to the Joint Ministries for monitoring and checking the implementation.
4. Standardization-Measurement-Quality Control agencies, financial agencies, and pricing agencies at all levels need to closely cooperate to ensure the effective implementation of this Joint Circular.
Any issues encountered during implementation should be promptly reflected to the Joint Ministries for supplementation and amendment as necessary.
This Circular takes effect from January 1, 1988, and replaces Joint Circular No. 776-TT/LB dated June 28, 1983.
Products currently implementing added prices according to Joint Circular No. 776-TT/LB shall continue to enjoy the previously determined added prices until the expiration of the state quality mark's validity period.
관계도
문서를 클릭하면 열립니다. 빨간 테두리＝효력을 변경하는 관계.